Samonaprawiający się robot – quasi-transakcyjność robota RPA3

Agnieszka Kajrunajtys; Danuta Kajrunajtys

doi:10.60154/zeszytynaukowe18.2023.1.1.05

Published: 2022-12-01

No. 18 (2022)

Self-healing robot – quasi-transaction robot RPA

Agnieszka Kajrunajtys , Danuta Kajrunajtys

Section: Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomii i Informatyki w Krakowie

https://doi.org/10.60154/zeszytynaukowe18.2023.1.1.05

Abstract

The subject of consideration are the conclusions from the implementation of the extension of the functionality of the
Wizlink® tool software with a breakthrough solution addressing the problem of «broken bot syndrome». With the increase in the practical use of RPA robots in organizations that automate the activities of employees in interaction with applications, problems revealed the scale of which could not be predicted before the implementation of automation. One of them is the problem of the RPA robot not completing the entire set of activities provided for in its scenario. The solution to this problem was the development and implementation of innovative quasi-transaction mechanisms of the robot. The solution is modelled on transaction monitors (CICS, Tuxedo) and the ACID transaction model. Thanks to this, in the vast majority of cases, the robot is able to automatically repeat the interrupted transaction or withdraw it. However, a robot referring to business application screens does not have such freedom of action as database management systems. Hence, the developed mechanism was called quasi-transactional, because it is not a fully universal solution.

Keywords:

Robotic Process Automation , RPA , broken bot syndrome , quasi-transaction robot RPA , Wizlink® tool software

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Kajrunajtys, A., & Kajrunajtys, D. (2022). Self-healing robot – quasi-transaction robot RPA. Journal of Management and Digital Transformation, (18), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.60154/zeszytynaukowe18.2023.1.1.05

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Zofia Gródek-Szostak, Olga Jando, Danuta Kajrunajtys, Key Competences in Undertaking and Conducting Business Activity – Own Research Results , Journal of Management and Digital Transformation: No. 13 (2017)

References

Carper W., Mohammed R. Unlocking Potential A Starter Handbook to Robotic Process Automation (RPA), https://www.opteamix.com/content/uploads/OPTEAMIX_A-Starter-Handbook-to-RPA-Whitepaper. pdf (dostęp 20.01.2023).
Google Scholar

Chybowska D., Chybowski L. Anthropocentric and Technocentric Approach in Creating Innovation, „Systemy Wspomagania w Inżynierii Produkcji. Inżynieria Systemów Technicznych” 2(11)/2015, s. 51-63.
Google Scholar

Connolly T. M., Begg C. E., Database Systems: A Practical Approach to Design, Implementation and Management. New Jersey, NJ: Pearson 2014.
Google Scholar

Doguc O. Robot Process Automation (RPA) and Its Future, “Handbook of Research on Strategic Fit and Design in Business Ecosystems” (ed. Hacioglu U.), IGI Global, 2019.
Google Scholar

Geleedst M., Identifying the most critical features of low-code platforms, “Msc.Information Management”; 2022; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358497539_Identifying_the_most_critical_features_of_ low-code_platforms
Google Scholar

Hochstein E. Surviving Broken Bot Syndrome: Scaling, Managing, and Maintaining your growing digital workforce successfully, “Robotic Process Automation Summit”, 07 February, 2020, Chicago History Museum. 98 Wyższa Szkoła Ekonomii i Informatyki w Krakowie
Google Scholar

https://www.choiceworx.com/resources/.
Google Scholar

https://www.cri.agh.edu.pl/uczelnia/tad/PSI2/?p=3
Google Scholar

https://docs-2.wizlink.eu/
Google Scholar

IEEE Guide for Terms and Concepts in Intelligent Process Automation, IEEE Corporate Advisory Group, IEEE 2755-2017.
Google Scholar

IEEE Guide for Taxonomy for Intelligent Process Automation Product Features and Functionality, IEEE 2755.1-2019.
Google Scholar

Lacity M., Willcocks L., Craig A. Robotic Process Automation at Telefónica O2, The Outsourcing Unit Working Research Paper Series, London 2015.
Google Scholar

Mason D. Ubiquitous Citizen Programming, “Procedia Computer Science” 98/2016, s. 169-173.
Google Scholar

Moffitt K. C., Rozario A. M., Vasarhelyi M. A., Robotic Process Automation for Auditing, “Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting”, 15(1)/2018, s. 1-10.
Google Scholar

Sobczak A. Robotic Process Automation as a Digital Transformation Tool for Increasing Organizational Resilience in Polish Enterprises, “Sustainability” 14/2022, 1333.
Google Scholar

Sutherland C. Racing with the Machine of Robotic Automation, “Framing a Constitution for Robotistan”, HfS Research, Ltd 2013.
Google Scholar

Walker J. What the heck? “broken bot syndrome”, 2021, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-heck-broken-bot-syndrome-jim-walker (dostęp 23.01.2023).
Google Scholar

Willcocks L., Lacity M., Craig A. The IT Function and Robotic Process Automation, “The Outsourcing Unit Working Research Paper Series”, London 2015.
Google Scholar

Van der Aalst W. M. P., Bichler M., Heinzl A. Robotic Process Automation, “Business & Information Systems Engineering”, 60(4)/2018, s. 269-272.
Google Scholar

Agnieszka Kajrunajtys

Affiliation:

First Byte sp. z o.o, Poland

Danuta Kajrunajtys

Affiliation:

First Byte sp. z o.o, Poland

No. 18 (2022)
Published: 2022-12-29

ISSN: 3072-5682

Publisher

Uniwersytet DSW Ideis

Licence CC