Tworzenie wspólnych projektów pomiędzy przemysłem a nauką

Ewa Zaraś-Leśniowska

Published: 2018-12-31

No. 14 (2018)

Creating joint projects between industry and science

Ewa Zaraś-Leśniowska

Abstract

The development and operation of enterprises in the conditions of the global economy obliges them to intensify cooperation with universities. The answer to the increase in innovation and competitiveness of the modern economy is the creation of mutual relations between scientific and business organizations, which allow companies to adapt to market requirements in terms of technology and organization. In the last few years there have been many opportunities to establish scientific cooperation, including through joint participation in projects co-financed from external funds. Despite the many joint projects implemented between organizations, the effects of cooperation are often limited. Barriers limiting cooperation are on both sides. The most important ones include too extensive bureaucracy and unnecessary formalities on both sides, which must be complied with when initiating and conducting mutual relations. It is also important to understand the needs of both parties, i.e. a business which goal is to implement interesting and cost-effective solutions (usually TRL> 5), science which is usually concentrated on the creative stage (usually TRL <5). Closing and reducing barriers will enable effective communication, networking, problem solving and promotion of common solutions. Creating conditions enabling the strengthening of contacts at the interface between science and business seems to be necessary from the point of view of the possibility of dynamizing the country’s economic development. The article discusses the barriers and proposes various forms of cooperation between science and business.

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Zaraś-Leśniowska, E. (2018). Creating joint projects between industry and science. Journal of Management and Digital Transformation, (14), 325–345. Retrieved from https://journalmdtr.org/index.php/jmdt/article/view/130

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

Robert Geisler, Sprzężenie zwrotne wiedzy z nauki do biznesu. Podejście antropologii gospodarki , Journal of Management and Digital Transformation: No. 14 (2018)
Olga Okrzesik, Barriers of cooperation of business support institutions with micro, small and medium enterprises in Poland , Journal of Management and Digital Transformation: No. 14 (2018)
Iryna Fedotova, Nadiia Bocharova, Agnieszka Rachwał-Mueller, Corporate social responsibility as an instrument of sustainable business development: exploring types and dimensions , Journal of Management and Digital Transformation: No. 19 (2023)
Zbigniew Handzel, Mirosław Gajer, Wind power as a major competitor to photovoltaics and the resulting problems associated with the need to balance capacity in the electricity system , Journal of Management and Digital Transformation: No. 19 (2023)
Ryszard Ćwiertniak, Markus Engert, Digitally Enhanced Business Pedagogy: The Evolution and Implications of Digital Business Presentations in Higher Education Institutions , Journal of Management and Digital Transformation: No. 19 (2023)
Błażej Mielczarek, Tomasz Olejnik, Financial forms of supporting young scientists in Poland , Journal of Management and Digital Transformation: No. 14 (2018)
Zbigniew Handzel, Mirosław Gajer, Zyntactic structures generator of controlled Danish language as a basis of construction of Machine-Aide Human Translation system , Journal of Management and Digital Transformation: No. 16 (2020)
Mirosław Gajer, Zbigniew Handzel, Application of Syntactic Structures Generators for the Aim of Reconstruction and Revitalization of Endangered Languages , Journal of Management and Digital Transformation: No. 15 (2019)
Wojciech Blecharczyk, Marcin Kandefer, Rola Krakowskiego Holdingu Komunalnego S.A. w zakresie gospodarki odpadowej Miasta Krakowa , Journal of Management and Digital Transformation: No. 17 (2021)
Anna Daszczyńska-Ciborowska, Paweł Łojek, Opportunities and threats related to the minimum corporate income tax , Journal of Management and Digital Transformation: No. 20 (2024)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

References

Archibugi D., Filippetti A., The retreat of public research and its adverse consequences on innovation, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 127, 2018.
Google Scholar

Bercovitz J., Feldman M., Entpreprenerial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development, „The Journal of Technology Transfer” 2006, Vol. 31, 2006.
Google Scholar

Cohen W.M., Fjeld J., The three legs of a stool: Comment on Richard Nelson, ‘‘The sciences are different and the differences matter’’, „Research Policy” 2016, Vol. 45.
Google Scholar

European Commission, European Innovation Scoreboard, 2016.
Google Scholar

European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation,” Funding — Awareness — Scale — Talent (FAST), Europe is back: Accelerating breakthrough innovation”, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/eic_hlg_bz_web.pdf.
Google Scholar

Filippetti A, Savona M., University – industry linkages and academic engagements: individual behaviours and firms’ barriers. Introduction to a special section, „The Journal of Technology Transfer” 2017, Vol. 42 (4).
Google Scholar

General Secretariat of the Council, Preparation of the Competitiveness Council on 29−30 May 2017 Economic rationale for public research and innovation funding and its impacts – Exchange of views, RECH 129.
Google Scholar

Geodecki T., Pomiar innowacyjności gospodarki przy użyciu pośrednich i bezpośrednich wskaźników innowacji, „Zarządzanie Publiczne” 2008, nr 3 (5).
Google Scholar

Golder-Buckley D, Way D., Glover M., Best Practice Strategies for Successful Innovation through University-Business Collaboration, Research Councils, 2015, [@:] http://www.ncub.co.uk/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=71&Itemid=.
Google Scholar

Grabowska-Szaniec A., Walkowiak K., Smakulski J., Współpraca uczelni wyższych z sektorem przedsiębiorców – możliwości, korzyści bariery, „Studia Edukacyjne” 2014, Vol. 31.
Google Scholar

Hall, B.H., Link A.N., Scott J.T., Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: Evidence from the advanced technology program, „The Journal of Technology Transfer” 2001, Vol. 26.
Google Scholar

Hanel P., St-Pierre M., Industry–university collaboration by Canadian manufacturing firms, „The Journal of Technology Transfer” 2006, Vol. 31.
Google Scholar

Ivascu L., Cirjaliu B., Draghici A., Business model for the University – Industry collaoration in open innovation, „Procedia Economics and Finance” 2016, Vol. 39.
Google Scholar

Komisja Europejska, Komunikat Komisji Europejskiej do Parlamentu Europejskiego, Rady, Europejskiego Komitetu Ekonomiczno-Społecznego i Komitetu Regionów dotyczący odnowionego programu UE dla szkolnictwa wyższego, SWD(2017) 164 final z dnia 30 maja 2017 r., http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/PL/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52017DC0247&from=PL.
Google Scholar

Keller S, Meaney M., Attracting and retaining the right talent, https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/attracting-and-retaining-the-right-talent, November 2017.
Google Scholar

Mayers A., How to Overcome the Barriers to Academic & Industry Collaboration, http://innovationexcellence.com/blog/2018/04/20/how-to-overcome-the-barriers-to-academic-industry-collaboration/.
Google Scholar

Meyer-Krahmer F., Schmoch U., Science-based technologies: University–industry interactions in four fields, „Research Policy” 1998, Vol. 27.
Google Scholar

Mowery D.C., Sampat B.N., Universities in national innovation systems, [w:] The Oxford handbook of innovation, red. J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R. Nelson, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2005.
Google Scholar

Mowery D.C., Shane S., Introduction to the special issue on university entrepreneurship and technology transfer, „Management Science” 2002, Vol. 48.
Google Scholar

Nelson R.R., The sciences are different and the differences matter, „Research Policy” 2016, Vol. 45.
Google Scholar

Nowak P., Poziom innowacyjności polskiej gospodarki na tle krajów UE, „PraceKomisji Geografii Przemysłu” 2012, nr 19.
Google Scholar

Podręcznik Oslo. Zasady gromadzenia i interpretacji danych dotyczących innowacji, OECD, Komisja Europejska, 2005.
Google Scholar

Thursby J.G., Thursby M.C., Are Faculty Critical? Their Role in University-Industry Licensing, NBER Working Paper No. 9991, September 2003, http://www.nber.org/papers/w9991.pdf.
Google Scholar

Tylec A., Ostraszewska Z., Poziom innowacyjności polski na tle unii europejskiej– analiza w oparciu o dekompozycję sumarycznego wskaźnika innowacji(SII), „Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Humanitas. Zarządzanie”2017, nr 3.
Google Scholar

Walczak-Matuszczyk K., 100 mld euro na innowacje w UE, Rzeczpospolita, Fundusze Europejskie, 29.05.2018 r., http://www.rp.pl/Fundusze-Europejskie/305299895-100-mld-euro-na-innowacje-w-UE.html.
Google Scholar

Whitley R., Varieties of scientific knowledge and their contributions to dealing with policy problems: A response to Richard Nelson’s „The sciences are different and the differences matter’’, „Research Policy” 2016, Vol. 45.
Google Scholar

No. 14 (2018)
Published: 2018-12-31

ISSN: 3072-5682

Publisher

Uniwersytet DSW Ideis

Licence CC

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Submit